Leaderboard › onlysearch.co
onlysearch.co
- Fresh results · 14 days
- 43%
- Dead profiles
- 3%
- Filters working
- 4/5
- Median search speed
- 1.3 s
onlysearch.co never tells you which results are ads
560 of 560 paid placements we found carried no "Ad" or "Sponsored" label. They look exactly like real search results.
- Up to 62% of the first 50 results on the Asian search are paid placements.
- Paying for placement is fine. Hiding it isn't: you can't tell which creators matched your search and which paid to be there.
Score over time
What we found
- Behind a Vercel bot checkpoint; only reachable with a real headful browser.
- The only site in its group whose filters truly combine (female -> Sydney 247 -> young 173 -> blonde 59).
- Combined search shows 153 unlabelled ads vs 38 organic; scrolling adds only ads.
- About every third card is an unlabelled paid redirect.
- The page's own code pre-loads its ad-click URLs as the page renders.
Score breakdown
| Component | Weight | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Fresh results | 20 | 43/100 |
| Live profiles | 10 | 97/100 |
| Ads labelled | 15 | 0/100 |
| Ad density | 10 | 54/100 |
| Filters that work | 15 | 80/100 |
| Page coverage | 10 | 60/100 |
| UK access | 10 | 100/100 |
| Search speed | 5 | 98/100 |
| Location accuracy | 15 | 86/100 |
| Page speed | 10 | 80/100 |
| Features | 15 | 40/100 |
| Tag accuracy | — | not yet measured |
Ads
0% of 560 paid placements were visibly labelled as ads.
Filters
4/5 criteria of the combined search (Sydney + blonde + young + female + cosplay) worked. Applied: Sydney, female, young, blonde (no cosplay).
Search speed
Median time from search to results: 1.3 s (server response 236 ms; our UK test connection alone 452 ms).
Network
Shares the OnlyFinder ad network (pur.agency) with:
- onlyfinder.com#11 · 67.4
- fanslist.com#4 · 74.3
- fanscentral.com#8 · 70.5
- onlyseeker.io#17 · 49.8
Paid cards route through the same a.pur.agency / onlysearch.click broker payload format.
Search-by-search results
| Search | Listed | Paid | Paid labelled | Organic checked | Live | Active (14 d) | Dead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — | — |
| England | 351 | 121 | 0/121 | 200 | 98% | 76% | 2% |
| London | 351 | 121 | 0/121 | 200 | 96% | 54% | 4% |
| Sedona, Arizona (pop. ~10k) | 352 | 122 | 0/122 | 0 | — | — | — |
| Asian | 26 | 16 | 0/16 | 10 | 100% | 20% | 0% |
| Red hair | 257 | 27 | 0/27 | 200 | 94% | 22% | 7% |
| Combined filter search | 191 | 153 | 0/153 | 38 | 92% | 32% | 8% |
Are the results really from there?
| Search | In the right place | In the UK / Arizona | Location not disclosed | Judged |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| England | 75% | 91% | 132 | 68 |
| London | 97% | 98% | 12 | 188 |
| Sedona, Arizona (pop. ~10k) | 0% (nearby 0%) | 93% AZ | 121 | 59 |
| Combined filter search | 93% | — | 11 | 27 |
Location comes from each creator's own OnlyFans profile, read by our scraper. Sedona counts creators in Sedona or Village of Oak Creek; "nearby" adds towns within ~30 miles (Cottonwood, Camp Verde, Flagstaff…).
Right of reply
Run onlysearch.co? Tell us what we got wrong. Replies are verified against your domain and published here after review.
Replies from the site
No replies from onlysearch.co yet.